On our project page, ( https://sites.google.com/site/imagingwithnature/) I have left several avenues for providing some feedback on our paper. Imaging With Nature: A Universal Analog Compressive Imager Using a Multiply Scattering Medium. I am contemplating writing a paper on TheWinnower on the various pre-publication peer reviews we received. Stay tuned. In the meantime, from the project page:
5. The Discussions and Post Publication Peer Reviews
There are multiples ways to provide a view on this work:
- Comment at PubMedCommons
- PubPeer: https://pubpeer.com/publications/D5387A52704EB8F1FA75CAEA74CC7F
- Be a Peer reviewer on https://publons.com
- Comment on the compressive sensing subreddit ( one of the author - IC - "controls" the content of this site )
- Comment on the Google+ group ( one of the author - IC - "controls" the content of this site )
- Comment in the comment section of this blog entry ( one of the author - IC - "controls" the content of this site )
If you want to remain anonymous and provide an input on this publication, use 1 through 3 or 4 (with a throwaway account) or 5 with an anonymous name. There is the possibility that in solution 4 through 6, your input might get deleted because of
- spam control
- sock puppet control
- A Parallel Compressive Imaging Architecture for One-Shot Acquisition
- Sharp Phase Transition for Joint Sparse Recovery (MMV)
- "Isn't it time, we devise a universal phase transition diagram for MMV computations?"
- CGIHT, ASD and ScaledASD: Compressed Sensing and Matrix Completion - implementation -
credit SOHO; ESA and NASA
Liked this entry ? subscribe to Nuit Blanche's feed, there's more where that came from. You can also subscribe to Nuit Blanche by Email, explore the Big Picture in Compressive Sensing or the Matrix Factorization Jungle and join the conversations on compressive sensing, advanced matrix factorization and calibration issues on Linkedin.
No comments:
Post a Comment