One of the issue with regards to post peer review publishing is the "game" system designed to answer the following question "how do we value reviews ?" There is a traditional way to go about it (do people really care if you were a reviewer for a journal ?) and then there is the new way, where your contribution will stack up somewhere and be viewable by many: Take for instance these two requests and their attendant expected "rewards":
and this one ?
No comments:
Post a Comment