Page Views on Nuit Blanche since July 2010

Please join/comment on the Google+ Community (1407), the CompressiveSensing subreddit (714),
the LinkedIn Compressive Sensing group (3214) or the Advanced Matrix Factorization Group (1006)

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Finding Structure with Randomness

The other day, Cable and I were looking for the PCA of a very large matrix. We compared the randomized approach to a direct one... it was not even funny. After four hours on one of the latest Mac, the direct SVD was still clogging all the processes while I was done in less than 20 seconds on a small PC. Today, the question is, when are we going to have a Random-LAPACK ?

Low-rank matrix approximations, such as the truncated singular value decomposition and the rank-revealing QR decomposition, play a central role in data analysis and scientific computing. This work surveys and extends recent research which demonstrates that randomization offers a powerful tool for performing low-rank matrix approximation. These techniques exploit modern computational architectures more fully than classical methods and open the possibility of dealing with truly massive data sets. This paper presents a modular framework for constructing randomized algorithms that compute partial matrix decompositions. These methods use random sampling to identify a subspace that captures most of the action of a matrix. The input matrix is then compressed—either explicitly or implicitly—to this subspace, and the reduced matrix is manipulated deterministically to obtain the desired low-rank factorization. In many cases, this approach beats its classical competitors in terms of accuracy, robustness, and/or speed. These claims are supported by extensive numerical experiments and a detailed error analysis. The specific benefits of randomized techniques depend on the computational environment. Consider the model problem of finding the k dominant components of the singular value decomposition of an m × n matrix. (i) For a dense input matrix, randomized algorithms require O(mn log(k)) floating-point operations (flops) in contrast to O(mnk) for classical algorithms. (ii) For a sparse input matrix, the flop count matches classical Krylov subspace methods, but the randomized approach is more robust and can easily be reorganized to exploit multiprocessor architectures. (iii) For a matrix that is too large to fit in fast memory, the randomized techniques require only a constant number of passes over the data, as opposed to O(k) passes for classical algorithms. In fact, it is sometimes possible to perform matrix approximation with a single pass over the data.

For reminder:


Petar Maymounkov said...

Is this what you are looking for:

This is random preconditioning, which works well in practice.

Igor said...