tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6141980.post2616012891149222370..comments2024-03-20T12:28:35.004-05:00Comments on Nuit Blanche: The wrath of our discontentIgorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17474880327699002140noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6141980.post-41462627828604347132011-11-24T13:52:28.867-06:002011-11-24T13:52:28.867-06:00Also like Petros said the system should probably l...Also like Petros said the system should probably leverage the recent google citation service and the microsoft equivalent. At the very least some people should get points for having published in a specific field, so we ought to use this information to perfect the point system.Igorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17474880327699002140noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6141980.post-77838573455423416762011-11-24T13:07:51.195-06:002011-11-24T13:07:51.195-06:00Thomas,
This is very interesting.
Igor.Thomas,<br /><br />This is very interesting.<br /><br />Igor.Igorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17474880327699002140noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6141980.post-33319416182601404072011-11-24T13:00:55.775-06:002011-11-24T13:00:55.775-06:00I think the service should be partitioned into dif...I think the service should be partitioned into different theoretical areas, much like ArXiv but possibly with a more fine-grained selection of areas. When users vote reviews up or down, the reviewer's credits should only be affected in the theoretical area of the reviewed article. This way, reviewers can have different ratings in different areas. This will help assess in which area(s) a reviewer can be relied upon and could encourage reviewers to try contributing in other areas, that are not necessarily their expertise, without destroying their credibility in areas where they already have a good rating.Thomas Arildsenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00461210615375168098noreply@blogger.com